Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294583›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Biomaterial and Hydrogel Strategies for Regenerative Microenvironment Reconstruction in Peripheral Nerve Conduits.

Wenjing Zhang, Yang Zhang, Hailin Ma, Lingxin Duan, Wenxiang Zhang, Ling Ding, Yuhui Kou, Baoguo Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Differential Effects of Calcium Alginate and Carboxymethylcellulose Wound Dressing Extracts on Human Sensory Neuron Regeneration and Secretome.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjing ZhangShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0009-0009-8472-5220
Yang ZhangShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-1452
Hailin MaShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3397-6766
Lingxin DuanShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Wenxiang ZhangShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8926-1615
Ling DingShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yuhui KouNational Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China.
Baoguo JiangShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Fund B2025088National Key R&D Program of China, Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) 2023YFC2509900Natural Science Foundation of China 52203204, U22A20162Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023TQ0221, GZB20230453Shenzhen clinical Research Center for Trauma Treatment LCYSSQ20220823091405012Shenzhen Medical Research Funds B2302050, D2401015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) poses a major clinical challenge, frequently resulting in chronic pain, muscle atrophy, and long-term functional impairment. While autologous nerve grafting remains the gold standard for repairing long-gap defects, its application is limited by donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have emerged as promising alternatives; however, their efficacy remains suboptimal, primarily because most fail to recapitulate the spatiotemporally coordinated regenerative microenvironment required for robust axonal extension, timely remyelination, and durable neurovascular integration. Key limitations of current designs include an inability to balance the bioactivity of natural materials with the tunability of synthetic polymers, insufficient nutrient and oxygen delivery for long-gap repair, and a lack of dynamic, stage-specific regulation of the healing process. Consequently, microenvironment reconstruction represents the central bottleneck to achieving effective regeneration. This review synthesizes recent advances in purposefully rebuilding the NGC microenvironment across three interdependent dimensions: (i) activation and functional regulation of Schwann cells; (ii) immunomodulation to resolve inflammation while promoting repair; (iii) angiogenesis to ensure metabolic support. We place special emphasis on biomaterial strategies, particularly advanced hydrogels that integrate physical, biochemical, and dynamic cues for spatiotemporally programmed regeneration. Finally, we outline design principles and translational considerations for next-generation NGCs aimed at closing the efficacy gap with autografts.

Indexed as

biomaterialshydrogelsnerve guidance conduitsperipheral nerve injuryregenerative microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41294583
PMCPMC12652607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.