ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Analysis of Gel Properties of Sodium Citrate-Treated Giant Squid and Pork for Surimi Production.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The giant squid, despite its abundance as a resource, is underutilized for surimi production due to its distinctive odor and poor gel-forming ability. While soaking (e.g., in sodium citrate) can alleviate the odor, its impact on the gel properties remains unclear. This study employed a comparative approach using pork, a benchmark for high-quality gels, to critically evaluate the gel properties of deodorized giant squid. The rheological, textural, and microstructural properties, as well as the water-holding capacity and water distribution, of squid (after sodium citrate soaking) and pork gels were compared. The results demonstrated that the squid gels exhibited a significantly lower storage modulus and higher tan δ value than pork gels, indicating inferior rheological properties. After cooking, the squid gel exhibited a bent shape and markedly lower hardness (approximately 259.78 g) and chewiness (approximately 226.09 g) compared to the pork gels (approximately 3305.92 g and 2781.27 g, respectively). Microstructurally, the squid gels presented a coarse, porous, and discontinuous network with larger pores, contrasting sharply with the fine, dense, and uniform matrix of the pork gels. Correspondingly, the squid gels had inferior water-holding capacity and a higher proportion of free water. This comparison demonstrates that the gel from sodium citrate-soaked giant squid is weak. More importantly, it provides mechanistic insights by highlighting the specific structural and hydration deficiencies responsible for its poor performance. The findings underscore that targeted strategies to modify the protein network are necessary for the effective utilization of giant squid in surimi production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.