ReviewDentistry journal2025
Hemophilic Pseudotumor of the Maxilla Secondary to Endodontic Treatment: Case Report and Systematic Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemophilic pseudotumor (HP) is a rare but severe complication of hemophilia, characterized by progressive bleeding in the muscles, joints, and bone tissue, which can lead to lytic lesions. Its prevalence is approximately 1-2% among patients with hemophilia. This report presents a male patient with mild hemophilia A who developed an intraosseous lesion in the posterior region of the right maxilla, with a prior history of endodontic treatment in the area. Surgical excision was performed and, following clinicopathological correlation, the lesion was diagnosed as HP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.