ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Arctic Puffin Optimization Algorithm Integrating Opposition-Based Learning and Differential Evolution with Engineering Applications.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Arctic Puffin Optimization (APO) algorithm, proposed in 2024, is a swarm intelligence optimization. Similar to other swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, it suffers from issues such as slow convergence in the early stage, being easy to fall into local optima, and insufficient balance between exploration and exploitation. To address these limitations, an improved APO (IAPO) algorithm incorporating multiple strategies is proposed. Firstly, a mirror opposition-based learning mechanism is introduced to expand the search scope, improving the efficiency of searching for the optimal solution, which enhances the algorithm's convergence accuracy and optimization speed. Secondly, a dynamic differential evolution strategy with adaptive parameters is integrated to improve the algorithm's ability to escape local optima and achieve precise optimization. Comparative experimental results between IAPO and eight other optimization algorithms on 20 benchmark functions, as well as CEC2019 and CEC2022 test functions, show that IAPO achieves higher accuracy, faster convergence, and superior robustness, securing first-place average rankings of 1.35, 1.30, 1.25, and 1.08 on the 20 benchmark functions, CEC 2019, 10- and 20-dimensional CEC 2022 test sets, respectively. Finally, simulation experiments were conducted on three engineering optimization design problems. IAPO achieved optimal values of 5.2559 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.