ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bioinspired Drilling for Extraterrestrial Applications.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review presents the novel synthesis of nature-inspired drilling strategies specifically tailored for extraterrestrial environments, where conventional technologies fail under the environmental conditions and power and mass constraints. Biomimetic drilling, inspired by insects, mollusks, reptiles, and other organisms, offers novel solutions for extraterrestrial subsurface exploration. Numerous organisms efficiently penetrate materials with low energy, using little force, and adapt to flexible substrates, which are essential capabilities for use off this planet. Traditional rotary and percussive drills do not function well under microgravity, at the end of the temperature spectrum, or in low energy and mass environments, such as landers which are typically under 300 kg and 200 W of power available. Nature-inspired approaches such as the reciprocating carpenter bee style have been shown to reduce overhead forces by as much as 50%; clam-like fluidization reduces drag by 90%; and sandfish-inspired methods improve mobility in granular media by 40%. These also improve the in situ resource utilization (ISRU) approaches for efficient sampling, water ice extraction, and planetary surface operations. This paper focuses on bio-drilling with other biological models, their engineering analogs, and exploration models for off-Earth use. Based on this synthesis, the paper recommends prioritizing dual-reciprocating and oscillatory mechanisms for near-term missions, while pursuing hybrid, AI-driven, and wear-resistant designs for long-term exploration. These approaches will help to improve penetration efficiency, reduce power demands, and extend the drilling system's lifespan in challenging extraterrestrial environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.