ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Longitudinal Model Identification and Controller Design for a Fish Robot with Control Fins via Experiments.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental longitudinal mode control approach for a biomimetic underwater robot. Input-output models for surge velocity and pitch angle were derived through experiments, considering the fish robot body with servo motors and control pins as a single system to solve the problem of fish robots, which are complex and nonlinear, and also contain uncertainty. Closed-loop control systems were designed using PID controllers based on these models, and their performance was verified through simulations and experiments. Surge velocity and pitch angle response models were developed for nominal surge velocities of 0.2 m/s and 0.4 m/s. The surge velocity response models exhibited high agreement rates of 75.25% and 81.23% between the identified linear models and experimental results at 0.2 m/s and 0.4 m/s, respectively. In contrast, the pitch angle response model showed lower agreement rates of 68.02% and 34.24% between the identified linear model and experimental results at 0.2 m/s and 0.4 m/s, respectively. The gain margin and phase margin of the surge controller were 28.7 dB and 116°, and 37.2 dB and 70.6°, respectively. For the pitch response model, the low-frequency gain of the transfer function was very small at -31 dB when the nominal surge velocity was 0.2 m/s; this gain increased to -8 dB when the nominal surge velocity was increased to 0.4 m/s. It was observed that the initial value responses of the pitch angle converged to 0° with some oscillations in both the simulations and experiments. Therefore, it is believed that by identifying a linear model and subsequently designing a controller based on it, the surge velocity of the fish robot can be effectively controlled while stabilizing its pitch angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.