ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Enhanced Educational Competition Optimizer Integrating Multiple Mechanisms for Global Optimization Problems.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An enhanced multi-strategy educational competition optimizer for numerical optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Hybrid Nonlinear Greater Cane Rat Algorithm with Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization for Global Optimization and Constrained Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Starfish Optimization Algorithm for Secure STAR-RIS Communications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Educational Competition Optimizer (ECO) formulates search as a three-stage didactic process-primary, secondary and tertiary learning-but the original framework suffers from scarce information exchange, sluggish late-stage convergence and an unstable exploration-exploitation ratio. We present EECO, which introduces three synergistic mechanisms: a regenerative population strategy that uses the covariance matrix of elite solutions to maintain diversity, a Powell mechanism that accelerates exploitation within promising regions, and a trend-driven update that adaptively balances exploration and exploitation. EECO was evaluated on the 29 benchmark functions of CEC-2017 and nine real-world constrained engineering problems. Results show that EECO delivers higher solution accuracy and markedly smaller standard deviations than eight recent algorithms, including EDECO, ISGTOA, APSM-jSO, LSHADE-SPACMA, EOSMA, GLSRIME, EPSCA, and ESLPSO. Across the entire experimental battery, EECO consistently occupied the first place in the Friedman hierarchy: it attained average ranks of 2.138 in 10-D, 1.438 in 30-D, 1.207 in 50-D, and 1.345 in 100-D CEC-2017 benchmarks, together with 1.722 on the nine real-world engineering problems, corroborating its superior and dimension-scalable performance. The Wilcoxon rank sum test confirms the statistical significance of these improvements. With its remarkable convergence accuracy and reliable stability, EECO emerges as a promising variant of the ECO algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.