Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294376›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2025

Tablet-Assisted Speech and Language Therapy for Acute Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial (LEXI Study).

Johannes Wischmann, Leanna Brasch, Julia Franzen, Jennifer Schwierz, Oksana Kovalenko, Andrea Gutmann, Franziska Erbert, Luisa Bußmann, Julia Lauer, Claudia Dumberger and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04080817 (Prospective, Randomized, Clinical & Experimental Controlled Noninvasive Study for Neolexon® Aphasia-App in Acute Aphasia After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04080817 naunknown statusnot on this map

Prospective, Randomized, Clinical & Experimental Controlled Noninvasive Study for Neolexon® Aphasia-App in Acute Aphasia After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorLudwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRan2019 to 2020Enrolled70ConditionsAphasia, Acquired, Stroke, AcuteArmsNeolexon, Speech therapy, Self training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Johannes WischmannDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0653-943X
Leanna BraschDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia FranzenDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jennifer SchwierzDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Oksana KovalenkoDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea GutmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franziska ErbertDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Luisa BußmannDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia LauerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claudia DumbergerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander MandlDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marie MehringerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annette MünstererDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia SpitzerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lena WinterhalterDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Vanessa FrankDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marika RheinwaldDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina LehnerInstitute for Social Sciences and Humanities, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule OTH, Regensburg, Germany.
Franziska AmmerClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof Park, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Angelika PfahlerClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof Park, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Stefanie LampartClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof Park, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Charlotte YoungClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof Park, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Peter YoungClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof Park, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Barbara GoettertRehabilitation Center, Passauer Wolf, Bad Griesbach, Germany.
Marcella BitzanRehabilitation Center, Passauer Wolf, Bad Griesbach, Germany.
Stephanie RinderRehabilitation Center, Passauer Wolf, Bad Griesbach, Germany.
Oliver MeierRehabilitation Center, Passauer Wolf, Bad Griesbach, Germany.
Katharina FeilDepartment of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-712X
Lars KellertDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4967-8336

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAphasia after acute stroke is a frequent and disabling condition, impairing communication and quality of life. We investigated whether tablet-assisted Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) using the Neolexon application is superior to standard SLT in acute stroke patients.

methodsIn this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial, patients with acute post-stroke aphasia were recruited from one stroke center and two neurorehabilitation clinics in Germany. Participants were stratified by aphasia severity and randomized to tablet-assisted SLT (n = 53) or standard SLT (n = 51), initiated during inpatient care and continued in rehabilitation (30 min/Day). The primary outcome was the change in the Bielefelder Aphasia Screening (BIAS) percentile rank from baseline to 90 days. Secondary outcomes included frequency and duration of self-training.

resultsFrom 07/2021 to 09/2024, 4097 patients were screened and 104 randomized (mean age 74.4 ± 11.2 years; 51.9% female). No significant difference in BIAS change was found at 90 days (18 vs. 14). The trial was stopped early for futility. The intervention group engaged in self-directed training more frequently (37.7% vs. 21.6%) and trained longer (10 vs. 4 h). Subgroup analyses showed benefits of tablet-assisted SLT in patients with mild (β = 15.51; 95% CI -1.67 to 32.69) and moderate aphasia (β = 23.58; 95% CI -4.48 to 51.65), and those with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of less than 5 (β = 21.69; 95% CI 5.54-37.84).

conclusionsAlthough underpowered to demonstrate overall superiority, tablet-assisted SLT showed potential benefits in patients with mild to moderate aphasia and less severe strokes in the acute setting.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04080817.

Indexed as

AphasiaComputers, HandheldLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeacute strokeaphasiacomputerized therapyneurorehabilitationrandomized controlled trialspeech and language therapy

Identifiers

PMID41294376
PMCPMC12649054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.