ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
A Graph Neural Network Charge Model Targeting Accurate Electrostatic Properties of Organic Molecules.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training a force field for proteins and small molecules from scratch.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Developing and Benchmarking Sage 2.3.0 with the AshGC Neural Network Charge Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Fine-Tuning Directional Message Passing Neural Networks: Predicting Properties of Conjugated Organic Polymers with High Accuracy.Polymers · 2026Article
- The Open Molecular Software Foundation (OMSF) and the Growing Role of Open Source Software in Molecular Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Review
- Atomistic Polymer Modeling: Recent Advances and Challenges in Building and Parametrization Workflows.Macromolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Common methods for assigning atom-centered partial charges in computational chemistry, such as RESP and AM1-BCC, rely on quantum mechanical or semiempirical calculations of the molecule of interest, which are expensive to compute and dependent on the choice of input molecular conformer(s). Graph neural network (GNN) based continuous atom embeddings have been shown to be a fast and flexible solution for partial charge assignment, but those developed so far for condensed phase modeling have usually been trained to reproduce AM1-BCC charges, which themselves seek to reproduce the HF/6-31G(d) molecular electrostatic potential. Here, we investigate the suitability of various common charge assignment schemes, including ESP and atoms-in-molecule (AIM) based approaches, as training targets for new GNN-based charge models. We show that the strengths of both approaches can be combined by cotraining GNN models to AIM charges and molecular dipoles and electrostatic potentials. We collect a data set of quantum mechanical AIM properties computed at a high level of theory (ωB97X-D/def2-tzvpp), in both vacuum and implicit solvent, and train new GNN charge models to each. Charges can be scaled between the vacuum and solvated charge sets, and combined with Lennard-Jones parameters optimized using the Open Force Field infrastructure, to yield force fields that are suitably polarized for condensed phase modeling. We further demonstrate that the charge models may be applied to explore electrostatics-driven structure-activity relationships in medicinal chemistry. The charge models are freely available at: https://github.com/cole-group/nagl-mbis/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.