ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Leveraging generative AI to foster metacognition and self-directed learning.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Truth, tone, and trust: integrating an AI exercise to foster responsible science communication in a graduate biomedical science course.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Developing metacognitive knowledge for effective AI-supported study behaviors in undergraduate biology: recommendations for instructors.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Reimagining plant science training in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a global perspective.The Plant cell · 2026Review
- Integrating Generative AI into public health education: a mixed methods evaluation of student experiences.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ever-expanding amount of data, students increasingly find themselves needing to engage in self-directed learning to be successful. Students studying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics often struggle with self-directed learning and are often discouraged, leading to higher attrition within these disciplines. There is a lack of opportunities for students to develop and practice self-directed learning skills within traditional curricula. This research explored the ways in which a generative artificial intelligence model could be used to cultivate metacognition and promote readiness for self-directed learning among graduate students. By leveraging the relationship between metacognition and self-directed learning, with the customizability of the artificial intelligence model, we sought to facilitate conversations between students and the model to enhance metacognitive awareness and self-directed learning readiness. Using the Metacognition Awareness Inventory and Self-Directed Learning Instrument, we found that students improved significantly on both pre- and post-assessment comparisons. Students needed to interact with the model twice a week, for 10 minutes per session. Our findings demonstrate a novel application of generative artificial intelligence in supporting students' personal development and expand our understanding of how artificial intelligence can be leveraged to generate a supportive process, rather than solely as a mechanism for generating answers or some other product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.