Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294340›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Training module and assessment strategy for light microscopy skills training in a research environment.

Kristopher E Kubow, Joseph A Harsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristopher E KubowDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0259-882X
Joseph A HarshDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training in specialized techniques and instrumentation is an important component of undergraduate and graduate education. While such training can occur in formal lab courses, it also occurs as students engage in research. Although training in a research lab setting is typically informal, implementing evidence-based practices from the classroom would be beneficial, particularly for learning complex techniques and instruments, for example, light microscopy. Using advanced microscopes for research is more complicated than using teaching microscopes in a course. In addition, microscopes are easy to misuse because they will generally always produce an image even if that image is suboptimal, misleading, or inaccurate. Here, we describe a backward-designed approach to individual or small-group microscope training for undergraduate life sciences research, including a training module and assessments. The approach was designed to be generalizable to a variety of microscopes and applications with performance tasks and survey measures to assess shifts in students' practical skills, knowledge, and attitude toward microscopy. Results are presented supporting the utility and efficacy of the unit and its components.

Indexed as

instrumentationlab techniquesmicroscopyself-efficacytechnical skillstrainingundergraduate research

Identifiers

PMID41294340
PMCPMC13130978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.