ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Significant Age-Related Visual Declines but Preserved Binocular Summation of Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity Across Adulthood.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Binocular Summation in Healthy Presbyopic Adults: Contrast Sensitivity and Defocus Curves.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Binocular summation refers to the enhanced visual performance when using two eyes instead of one. Although well established in young adults, how binocular summation and its underlying mechanisms change with normal aging remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize age-related changes in binocular summation for contrast sensitivity (CS) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA) across adulthood and evaluate the mechanisms underlying this integration. Methods: We measured monocular and binocular CS and VA using the Pelli-Robson and ETDRS charts in 292 normally-sighted individuals aged 18 to 87, grouped into seven age bins. Binocular summation ratio (BSR) was computed as the ratio of binocular to better-eye sensitivity. To examine the underlying mechanisms, we fit and compared binocular summation models to the BSR data for both VA and CS. Results: Across adulthood, both binocular CS and VA declined substantially, by approximately 37% and 59%, respectively, whereas interocular differences remained modest (<15%) and stable throughout adulthood. Binocular summation was significant for both CS (∼47% gain) and VA (∼6% gain) without any significant age-related changes. Model comparisons revealed that CS summation followed a near-quadratic summation model (m = 1.85), whereas high-contrast VA summation was better described by a weighed linear model approximating signal averaging between two eyes (w1 = 1.76, w2 = 1.86), suggesting district underlying mechanisms. Conclusions: Despite significant age-related visual decline, binocular summation for both CS and VA remains robust across adulthood. These findings suggest that the cortical mechanisms supporting binocular integration are largely preserved with normal aging and provide clinically meaningful benchmarks for assessing binocular vision throughout adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.