Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294302›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Distinct Profiles of Choriocapillaris Involvement in Extensive Macular Atrophy With Pseudodrusen-Like Appearance and Geographic Atrophy.

Alberto Quarta, Giulia Corradetti, Francesco Romano, Andrea Trinco, Alessandro Feo, Federico Corvi, Claudia Nardi, Mai Alhelaly, Rouzbeh Abbasgholizadeh, Shinichiro Chujo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global choroidal thickness in healthy eyes assessed by ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alberto QuartaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Giulia CorradettiDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Francesco RomanoEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea TrincoEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro FeoDepartment of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Federico CorviEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Claudia NardiEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Mai AlhelalyDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Rouzbeh AbbasgholizadehDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Shinichiro ChujoDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Marko PopovicDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Ceren SoyluDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Yu-Chien ChungDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Hyun Duck KwakDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Rayna RattuDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Muneeswar G NittalaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.
Giovanni StaurenghiEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Srinivas R SaddaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To quantitatively compare choriocapillaris flow deficit percentages (CCFD%) between eyes with extensive macular atrophy with pseudodrusen-like appearance (EMAP) and geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and to identify predictive factors for CCFD% at the atrophy margin. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 53 eyes (27 with GA and 26 with EMAP). CCFD% were computed within a 500-µm-wide marginal zone (CCFD%_M) and beyond the margin (CCFD%_BM) using compensated en face optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. Atrophy-to-fovea distance (AFD) was quantified by pixel-wise Euclidean analysis. Results: Eyes with EMAP demonstrated significantly higher CCFD% compared to GA both at the atrophy margin (CCFD%_M, P < 0.05) and beyond (CCFD%_BM, P < 0.01). In univariable analysis, belonging to the GA group was associated with a 5.9-unit reduction in CCFD%_M, reflecting a substantial preservation of choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion in GA relative to EMAP. AFD was greater in EMAP (2.35 ± 0.56 mm) than GA (1.74 ± 0.55 mm; P = 0.014) suggesting more eccentric positioning of the lesions in the former. A multivariable mixed-effects model confirmed disease subtype (EMAP vs. GA) as an independent determinant of CC impairment with EMAP associated with a significantly higher CCFD%_M (P < 0.01). Conclusions: CC impairment is more pronounced in EMAP than in GA, with EMAP exhibiting more extensive and diffuse CCFD, particularly at the atrophy margins. This pattern may reflect a more aggressive vascular compromise in EMAP. These findings underscore a distinct CC pathoanatomy between the two conditions, with implications for disease progression and therapeutic targeting.

Indexed as

ChoroidGeographic AtrophyMacular DegenerationRetinal DrusenAgedAged, 80 and overCapillariesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41294302
PMCPMC12663873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.