Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294301›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Red Blood Cell Distribution and Volume Changes at Capillary Junctions in the Living Human Retina.

Yifu Ding, Andrew Metha, Phillip Bedggood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifu DingDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew MethaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Phillip BedggoodDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize red blood cell (RBC) distribution and associated changes in cell size at capillary junctions in the human neural retina. Methods: Cell-resolved blood flow across 60 capillary junctions in the retina of 6 healthy human subjects was measured, using flood-illumination adaptive optics at 200 to 400 fps. Several empirical RBC partitioning models, including a widely used model developed by Pries et al., were compared for predictive accuracy. Results: We provide updated Pries model coefficients to suit human retinal capillaries. We also propose a simpler linear model that predicts RBC flow distribution based solely on the share of blood flow received by a branch, without reference to the main vessel. Cell size analysis revealed that the average RBC volume in branch vessels was 5.5% lower than in the main vessel (P < 0.05). The reduction in cell volume accompanied a 2.3 µm increase in inter-cell spacing (P < 10-4) and a 3.0% decrease in hematocrit (P < 10-4). These findings support the hypothesis of a net transfer of water from RBCs to plasma as they pass through narrower capillary branches, with potential reabsorption by the time cells enter wider collecting capillaries. Conclusions: This study provides the first noninvasive in vivo characterization of RBC partitioning behavior at capillary junctions in the living human retina. The subtle fluid exchange between cells and plasma may play a role in optimizing oxygen delivery to support immediate metabolic needs.

Indexed as

CapillariesErythrocytesErythrocyte VolumeRetinal VesselsAdultBlood Flow VelocityCell SizeFemaleHealthy VolunteersHematocritHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood Flow

Identifiers

PMID41294301
PMCPMC12663880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.