Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294282›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Development of a defacing algorithm to protect the privacy of head and neck cancer patients in publicly-accessible radiotherapy datasets.

Kayla O'Sullivan-Steben, Luc Galarneau, John Kildea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kayla O'Sullivan-StebenMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Luc GalarneauMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
John KildeaMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRossy Cancer Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in public medical imaging datasets has raised concerns about potential patient reidentification from head CT scans. However, existing defacing algorithms, which help protect patient confidentiality, fail to preserve critical radiotherapy structures, including organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Furthermore, current algorithms do not address the defacing of DICOM-RT structure set and dose data, which also contain information for facial surface rendering. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a novel automated defacing algorithm that preserves OARs and PTVs while removing identifiable features from HNC CTs and DICOM-RT data.

methodsEye contours were used as landmarks to automate the removal of CT pixels above the inferior-most slice of the eye and anterior to the midpoint of the eye. Pixels within PTVs were retained if they intersected with the removed region. The body contour and dose map were then reshaped to reflect the defaced image. We validated our approach on 829 HNC CT-simulation scans from 622 patients. To evaluate privacy protection, we applied the FaceNet512 facial recognition algorithm before and after defacing on 3D-rendered CT scan pairs from 70 patients at two time points. To assess research utility, we examined the impact of defacing on auto-contouring performance using LimbusAI and analyzed the locations of PTVs relative to the defaced regions.

resultsBefore defacing, the facial recognition algorithm matched 97% of patients' CT scans. After defacing, this rate dropped to just 4%. LimbusAI effectively auto-contoured organs in the defaced CTs, with perfect Dice scores of 1 for OARs below the defaced region, and mean Dice scores exceeding 0.95 for OARs on the same slices as the defaced region. PTV analysis revealed that 86% of PTVs were entirely below the cropped region, 9.1% were on the same slice as the crop without overlap, and only 4.9% extended into the cropped area. All overlapping PTVs were preserved through our algorithm's design.

conclusionsWe developed a novel defacing algorithm that anonymizes HNC CT scans and related DICOM-RT data. Our algorithm balances patient privacy while preserving essential structures for radiotherapy research, facilitating the sharing of HNC imaging datasets for Big Data and AI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsConfidentialityHead and Neck NeoplasmsPrivacyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgans at RiskTomography, X-Ray ComputedCT anonymizationdefacingradiotherapy data‐sharing

Identifiers

PMID41294282
PMCPMC12649283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.