Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294255›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026

Clinic Versus Home: Nurses' and Social Workers' Perceptions of Extended Home Visits.

Mattias Wennergren, Ann Jansson, Julie Showich Lundgren

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mattias WennergrenGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-4991
Ann JanssonDepartment of Child Health Services, Regionhälsan, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Julie Showich LundgrenCenter for Progress in Children's Mental Health, Child and Youth Health Specialty Services, Regional Healthcare, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3167-3190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to compare providers' ratings of delivery and fidelity of a post-natal extended home visiting programme within Child Health Services for visits conducted in families' homes versus the clinic setting.

methodsA retrospective quantitative study based on questionnaires (n = 3028) from child health services nurses and social workers was conducted using non-parametric tests to determine if there were any differences in professionals' perceptions of programme delivery and/or quality.

resultsThe results from this study indicate significant differences in professionals' perceptions of fidelity, confidence in abilities, content coverage, alliance-building, and emotional climate between home and clinic visits, with higher ratings given in all areas for visits conducted in the home.

conclusionWhile clinic visits may offer certain logistical advantages for professionals and primary care clinics, they may not provide the optimal environment for delivering the programme with fidelity, which is necessary for achieving the desired outcomes for child health and family well-being. The findings need to be taken into consideration when making decisions about resource allocation for early childhood programmes aimed at equitable health for a more sustainable society.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChild Health ServicesHouse CallsNursesSocial WorkersAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaireschild health servicesdelivery of health carehome visitsinfantSweden

Identifiers

PMID41294255
PMCPMC12889997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.