Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294253›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2026

Early versus delayed insertable cardiac monitor implantation after ESUS stroke and the yield of atrial fibrillation detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lucio D'Anna, Gabriele Prandin, Matteo Foschi, Samir Abu-Rumeileh, Francesco Favruzzo, Renato Simonetti, Lorenzo Barba, Giovanni Merlino, Francesco Bax, Arsalan Faiz and 15 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Atrial fibrillation detected after stroke: Recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Lucio D'AnnaDepartment of Stroke and Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-3322
Gabriele PrandinClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5698-4737
Matteo FoschiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-7155
Samir Abu-RumeilehDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-8506
Francesco FavruzzoComprehensive Stroke Center, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-6027
Renato SimonettiUnidad de Ictus, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Lorenzo BarbaDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Giovanni MerlinoClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital and Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Francesco BaxJ. Philip Kistler Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1725-1175
Arsalan FaizDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Markus OttoDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Jianqun GuanDepartment of Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Asha BarnardDepartment of Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Lydia JeffreyDepartment of Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Jake DaganDepartment of Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Tsering DolkarDepartment of Stroke and Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Jonathan HaytonDepartment of Stroke and Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Mariarosaria ValenteClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital and Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Gian Luigi GigliClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital and Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Simona SaccoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Maurizio PaciaroniDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Arvind ChandrathevaComprehensive Stroke Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-3508
Robert SimisterComprehensive Stroke Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Soma BanerjeeDepartment of Stroke and Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Phang Boon LimDepartment of Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection following cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is well established. However, the optimal timing for ICM implantation to maximize diagnostic yield remains uncertain.

aimsTo systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether earlier ICM implantation after cryptogenic stroke or ESUS ischemic stroke improves detection rates and reduces the time to AF diagnosis. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted from inception to June 2025, without language restrictions. References of retrieved articles and relevant reviews were manually searched. We included observational studies or randomized trials reporting ICM use in patients with ESUS or cryptogenic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), providing data on AF detection rates and/or timing metrics (stroke-to-ICM interval, ICM-to-AF interval). Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or third-party adjudication. Data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Study-level AF detection rates were modeled using logit-transformed proportions and pooled using random-effects models (REML). Mixed-effects meta-regressions assessed the effect of timing (stroke-to-ICM interval) on AF detection and diagnostic delay, adjusting for ICM monitoring duration. The primary outcomes were pooled AF detection rate and mean time from ICM implantation to AF diagnosis. Timing of implantation was assessed as a continuous and categorical (early, intermediate, delayed) variable. Forty-seven studies (

conclusionThese findings suggest that earlier ICM implantation enhances AF detection after ESUS or cryptogenic stroke and shortens diagnostic delay. Optimizing timing of post-stroke monitoring may improve patient selection for anticoagulation and reduce recurrent stroke risk.CRD 420251064227.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationEmbolic StrokeStrokeHumansTime FactorsTreatment Delayatrial fibrillationCryptogenic strokeESUSimplantable cardiac monitor (ICM)timing

Identifiers

PMID41294253
PMCPMC13392177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.