ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Optimizing Photoinitiator Concentration in 3D-Printed Resins for Provisional Dental Restorations.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of post-curing protocols on the optical properties of provisional and long-term 3D-printable resin composites.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the effect of different TPO photoinitiator concentrations on the mechanical, physicochemical, and biological properties of 3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations. The resin was formulated with 60 wt.% UDMA, 40 wt.% TEGDMA, 1 wt.% TPO, 0.01 wt.% BHT, and 5 wt.% BaSil. TPO was incorporated at concentrations of 1, 2, and 3 wt.% (TPO1%, TPO2%, and TPO3%, respectively). Specimens were designed using software and printed with an SLA/LCD 3D printer. Post-processing involved ultrasonication in isopropanol followed by UV curing for either 10 or 30 minutes. The resins were evaluated for degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength and modulus, Knoop microhardness, softening in solvent, color stability, and cytotoxicity. No significant difference in DC was observed between TPO1% and TPO3% for both post-polymerization times (p >0.05). TPO3% post-polymerized for 10 minutes exhibited the highest flexural strength and modulus (p <0.05). All groups showed a reduction in hardness after solvent exposure. No statistical difference was found for ΔKHN% (p > 0.05), but post-polymerization time significantly influenced ΔKHN% in the TPO1% group (p < 0.05). Cytotoxicity did not differ significantly among groups (p >0.05). TPO1% post-polymerized for 30 minutes exhibited a color change within clinically acceptable thresholds. The 3D-printed resin with 3% TPO demonstrated significant improvements in mechanical properties, an increased degree of conversion, and no cytotoxic effects. However, it exhibited a significant color change after aging. The 1% TPO group post-cured for 30 minutes showed promising overall results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.