Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294203›Full record

ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025

Flávia Pires Bretas Delaroli, Ana Paula Christakis Costa, Juliano Bacom Modesto Setti, Patrícia Moreira de Freitas, Victor Elias Arana-Chavez, Maristela Maia Lobo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flávia Pires Bretas DelaroliPostgraduate Program in Odontology. São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-8185-794X
Ana Paula Christakis CostaFederal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Graduate School of Electrical Engineering and Applied Computer Sciences (CPGEI), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-3602
Juliano Bacom Modesto SettiPostgraduate Program in Odontology. São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-2886-5172
Patrícia Moreira de FreitasDepartment of Restorative Dentistry. Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry. School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6049-1732
Victor Elias Arana-ChavezDepartment of Biomaterials and Oral Biology. Postgraduate Program in Dentistry/Oral Biology. School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7812
Maristela Maia LoboAssociate Professor. Department of Postgraduate Program in Odontology, concentrated area of Orofacial Harmonization. São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-8851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate, in vitro, the hydrolysis of PDO monofilament threads when incubated in 4 different solutions: Group A (GA) with saline solution; Group B (GB) with non-reticulated hyaluronic acid TKN HA - MW 2% (Toskani); Group C (GC) with NCTFTM. 135 HA (Filorga) and Group D (GD) with NC 160 (PHD from Brazil). For this purpose, three filaments of 1.0 cm of PDO thread (I-thread monofilament smooth 29G/38 mm, from MedBeauty) were incubated and measured at times: 0, 7, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 63 days after the start of the experiment. The sample hydrolysis was assessed by absorbance spectrometry, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Stundet-Newman-Keuls t-test using SPSS 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and BioEstat 5.0 (Manirauá Foundation, Belém, PA, Brazil) software programs, with a significance level of 5%. The spectrometry results showed that up to 14 days, the different solutions had distinct effects on the hydrolysis of PDO threads (p=0.023). After 45 days, the sample hydrolyses did not present a significant difference between the four groups, indicating that all tested solutions had a similar effect on the PDO threads (p=0.065). After 63 days, only groups GA (p=0.029) and GD (p=0.042) threads remained non-hydrolyzed, while others were completely degraded. In conclusion, the PDO association with intradermic injectables based on non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) affects the hydrolysis of the threads over time.

Indexed as

FaceHyaluronic AcidRejuvenationHumansHydrolysisMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID41294203
PMCPMC12641584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.