Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294199›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2025

Mortality, intensive care unit admission, and ventilatory support in pregnant and nonpregnant women with COVID-19 in Brazil: a paired observational study.

Ana Elisa Madalena Rinaldi, Camila Abadia Rodrigues Meira, Marília Neves Santos, Luciana Bertoldi Nucci, Carla Cristina Enes, Wolney Lisboa Conde

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Elisa Madalena RinaldiUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia - Uberlândia (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-554X
Camila Abadia Rodrigues MeiraUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia - Uberlândia (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-2529
Marília Neves SantosUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia - Uberlândia (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-3894
Luciana Bertoldi NucciPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-3622
Carla Cristina EnesPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-4402
Wolney Lisboa CondeUniversidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0493-134X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and use of invasive ventilatory support in hospitalized pregnant and nonpregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to Coronavirus-2 in Brazil.

methodsIt is a cross-sectional study developed with data from the Brazilian Surveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Ministry of Health. Three outcomes were investigated: mortality, ICU admission, and use of invasive ventilatory support among COVID-19 cases. Hospitalized pregnant and nonpregnant women were paired according to age group, geographic region, and epidemiological week (33,113 nonpregnant women; 15,567 pregnant women) from March 2020 to March 2022. Associations between pregnancy status and outcomes were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. For 2021 data, an interaction term with vaccination status (no/yes) was included.

resultsMortality (17.6 vs 7.9%), ICU admission (30.3 vs 26.1%), and invasive ventilatory support use (46.6 vs 38.5%) were higher among nonpregnant women, respectively. ICU admission was highest in the second trimester of pregnancy (32.6%). Being in the second trimester increased the likelihood of ICU admission (OR=1.26; 95%CI 1.15-1.39) compared to nonpregnant women. The odds of ICU admission was lower among vaccinated pregnant women in the first (OR=0.71; 95%CI 0.51-0.96), second (OR=0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.88), and third trimesters (OR=0.65; 95%CI 0.57-0.74).

conclusionAll three outcomes were more frequent among hospitalized nonpregnant women, except for ICU admission in the second trimester. COVID-19 vaccination has proven to be an important protective measure, particularly for pregnant women in the second and third trimesters.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intensive Care UnitsPatient AdmissionPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRespiration, ArtificialAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedPregnancySARS-CoV-2Young Adult

Identifiers

PMID41294199
PMCPMC12643388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.