Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294137›Full record

SynthesisJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026

Impact of Phosphoric Acid Etching Duration on the Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives on Enamel: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.

Tarek Amran, Jeronim Esati, Roland Weiger, Markus B Blatz, Florin Eggmann

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarek AmranDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jeronim EsatiDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roland WeigerDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0468-6639
Markus B BlatzDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-7047
Florin EggmannDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6185-1480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe optimal duration of phosphoric acid etching (PAE) for enamel bonding remains uncertain, particularly in the context of universal adhesives. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether shortened etching times (< 15 s) provide comparable bond strength to conventional protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsSearches were conducted across four databases, including Embase, OpenGrey through DANS, PubMed, and Scopus. Laboratory studies on human or bovine enamel specimens, treated with varying PAE durations prior to the application of universal adhesives, were included. Data regarding etching protocols, adhesive types, substrate preparation (ground vs. unground enamel), and bond strength outcomes were analyzed. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoBDEMAT tool.

resultsOf 762 records screened, eight laboratory studies met inclusion criteria. Etching times of 3-15 s achieved bond strengths that were statistically non-inferior to conventional durations, with no added benefit from prolonged etching. Ground enamel consistently showed enhanced bond strength with PAE, whereas unground enamel exhibited similar bonding trends. The risk of bias was most often due to inadequate sample size justification, deficiencies in randomization, and absence of blinding.

conclusionsShort-duration PAE (3-15 s) appears sufficient for effective bonding of universal adhesives to enamel, while minimizing potential risk of over-etching of adjacent dentin. Future research should focus on tailoring etching protocols based on cavity-specific characteristics and exploring alternative pretreatment methods to enhance bonding performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This review suggests that abbreviated phosphoric acid etching (3-15 s) provides enamel bond strengths equivalent to conventional durations when universal adhesives are used. This approach may reduce the risk of inadvertent dentin over-etching in mixed-substrate cavities while maintaining optimal adhesive performance.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalDental BondingDental CementsDental EnamelPhosphoric AcidsAnimalsCattleHumansTime FactorsDental Cementsphosphoric acidPhosphoric Acidsdental acid etchingdental bondingdental materialsdental restoration failurein vitro techniquespermanent dental restoration

Identifiers

PMID41294137
PMCPMC13069211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.