ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Effect of Different Airborne-Particle Abrasion Strategies on Dentin Bond Strength: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Spot-Dam Technique: A Protocol for Adhesive Cementation of BOPT Crowns.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Influence of Varying Airborne-Particle Abrasion Angles on Surface Properties and Flexural Strength of Feldspar Ceramic.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Effect of Different Airborne-Particle Abrasion Strategies on Dentin Bond Strength: An In Vitro Study.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the influence of dentin airborne-particle abrasion techniques on the microtensile bond strength, using two adhesive strategies (self-etch and etch&rinse). MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty molars were assigned to two groups (n = 10) according to the bonding system (Clearfil SE Bond or Optibond FL), divided into four parts and submitted to different surface treatments: no pretreatment (control), airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide without irrigation (Al
resultsStatistically significant differences were found for both adhesive strategy (p < 0.001) and pretreatment (p < 0.001). Al
conclusionsAluminum oxide with simultaneous irrigation resulted in the highest bond strength values, while without irrigation bond strength outcomes depend on the adhesive strategy. Bioactive glass did not interfere with bonding performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion with concomitant irrigation presents the preferable surface pretreatment strategy when bonding to sound dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.