ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Advancing Yeast Identification Using High-Throughput DNA Barcode Data From a Curated Culture Collection.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Study of Probiotic Properties and Safety Aspects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing Yeast Identification Using High-Throughput DNA Barcode Data From a Curated Culture Collection.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yeast identification is essential in fields ranging from microbiology and biotechnology to food science and medicine. While DNA barcoding has become the standard for identifying cultured strains, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has revolutionised microbial community profiling, providing deeper insights into yeast communities across diverse ecosystems. A major challenge in DNA (meta)barcoding remains the limited availability of high-quality reference sequences, which are critical for accurate species identification and comprehensive taxonomic profiling of both environmental and clinical samples. To address this gap, the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WI) launched a DNA barcoding initiative in 2006 to generate high-quality, often type-derived ITS and LSU barcodes for all ~100,000 fungal strains preserved in the CBS culture collection, including approximately 15,000 yeasts. Building on the yeast barcode dataset released in 2016, we now present an expanded set of 2856 ITS and 3815 LSU sequences, representing 911 and 1137 yeast species, respectively. Notably, 27%-29% of these sequences are derived from ex-type cultures. Using both newly generated and previously published barcodes, we assess the taxonomic resolution of commonly used yeast metabarcoding markers (ITS, ITS1, ITS2 and LSU) and propose marker-specific similarity cutoffs for different yeast taxonomic groups. These results provide actionable guidance for marker selection and improve the interpretation of metabarcoding data. We further demonstrate the impact of well-curated reference databases with up-to-date taxonomy by reanalyzing Human Microbiome Project data, revealing how diet and environment shape the gut mycobiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.