Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294047›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

Organ Donation After Medical Aid in Dying: An Ethical Overview.

David Rodríguez-Arias, María Victoria Martínez-López, Luis Espericueta, Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho, Jed Adam Gross, Janet Delgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Rodríguez-AriasCátedra Youngner de Bioética Empírica, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
María Victoria Martínez-LópezCátedra Youngner de Bioética Empírica, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-1413
Luis EspericuetaCátedra Youngner de Bioética Empírica, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-0170
Gonzalo Díaz-CobachoCátedra Youngner de Bioética Empírica, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Jed Adam GrossDepartment of Clinical & Organizational Ethics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janet DelgadoCátedra Youngner de Bioética Empírica, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

This study was supported by the INEDyTO-2 Project: Bioethics and end-of-life practices (PID2020-118729RB-I00), and the INEDyTO-3 Project: Bioethics and end-of-life practices II. End-of-life national observatory (PID2024-161389OB-I00). Agencia Estatal de Investigación, funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) and Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada/CBUA.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ Donation after Medical Aid in Dying (OD-MAiD) is currently practised in four countries: Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain. While OD-MAiD shares some similarities with MAiD (absent the possibility of organ donation) and with standard organ donation protocols, the combination of OD and MAiD involves unique circumstances that present novel ethical challenges. These challenges revolve around donors' consent and protection, the dead donor rule, and organ allocation. This paper explores these moral challenges and proposes strategies to ensure ethical safeguards in the context of OD-MAiD. An underlying question is whether OD-MAiD, if permitted, should follow the ethical guidelines of living donation or deceased donation, as these two practices commonly operate under distinct moral paradigms. While the living donation paradigm is centred on the protection of donors' interests and emphasises individual choice by allowing donors to decide who receives their organs, the deceased donation framework places more emphasis on enabling recipients to benefit from transplant, and organ allocation is typically based on impartiality. OD-MAiD also raises ethical concerns about how the possibility of donation could influence a patient's decision to seek euthanasia and/or interfere with optimal end-of-life care. Proposing organ donation to individuals considering MAiD could conceivably create pressure to proceed with euthanasia, either to realise a social good or to satisfy the needs of loved ones (if a family member requires an organ). This may undermine the patient's autonomy or well-being at the end of life.

Indexed as

Suicide, AssistedTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsBelgiumDecision MakingHumansInformed ConsentNetherlandsPersonal AutonomyTerminal Careautonomydead donor rulemedical aid in dyingorgan donationtrust

Identifiers

PMID41294047
PMCPMC12918502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.