ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Prevalence of Esophageal Dysmotility and Reflux in Muscle Tension Dysphonia Patients.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Esophageal Dysmotility and Reflux in Muscle Tension Dysphonia Patients.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLaryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) contributes to muscle tension dysphonia (MTD); however, symptoms overlap with esophageal dysmotility. Study aims were to determine the prevalence of esophageal disorders among MTD patients and correlate pathologies to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
methodsRetrospective chart review of MTD patients diagnosed by laryngologists who underwent barium esophagram for suspected LPR. Demographics, Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10), Voice Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), and imaging were reviewed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare VHI-10 and V-RQOL across groups. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was applied to compare scores including their subitems, between dysmotility only and reflux only groups.
resultsA total of 128 patients with MTD underwent barium esophagram. The average age was 61 years; 70% were female. Esophageal findings included dysmotility only (31%), reflux only (24%), both (12%), and neither (33%). The reflux-only group reported significantly worse voice-related outcomes on PROMS compared to dysmotility only. Reflux-only patients had higher total VHI-10 (p = 0.04) and were more likely to report difficulty being heard (p = 0.01), understood in noisy environments (p = 0.02), restricted socially (p < 0.01), and left out of conversations (p = 0.03). V-RQOL items like speaking loudly (p = 0.04), using phone (p = 0.04), performing work duties (p = 0.03), and feeling less outgoing (p = 0.02) were also more negatively impacted in reflux-only.
conclusionEsophageal dysmotility is prevalent in MTD patients and may mimic LPR. Patients with reflux may have more negative impacts on V-RQOL. Although esophagrams can be used as a screening tool, further studies can help elucidate the connection between esophageal dysmotility and laryngeal function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.