ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Prediction of Individual Melodic Contour Processing in Sensory Association Cortices From Resting State Functional Connectivity.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Individual Melodic Contour Processing in Sensory Association Cortices From Resting State Functional Connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that it is possible to predict an individual brain's spatial activation pattern in response to a paradigm from their functional connectivity at rest (rsFC). However, it is unclear whether this prediction works across the brain. We here aim to understand whether individual task activation can be best predicted in local regions that are highly specialised to the task at hand or whether there are domain-independent regions in the brain that carry most information about the individual. To answer this question, we used fMRI data from participants at rest and during an auditory oddball paradigm. We then predicted individual differences in brain responses to melodic deviants from their rsFC both across the whole brain and within the auditory cortices. Predictability was consistently higher in sensory association cortices: In the local (auditory cortex) parcellation, the best predicted area was the right superior temporal gyrus (STG), an auditory association area, while in the global parcellation, the best predicted network was the bilateral visual association cortex. Our results indicate that individual differences can be predicted in paradigm-relevant areas or general areas with high inter-individual variability. Predicting individual task activation from rsFC may be of clinical relevance in cases where patients are unable to carry out a certain task, such as, to inform surgical targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.