Trial reportHistopathology2026
Rethinking Gleason pattern quantification in predicting metastasis: results of 20 years of follow-up in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Trial report in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of biopsy gleason pattern 4 percentage and length in grade group 2 prostate cancer patients.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Gleason grading system for prostate cancer (PCa) is based on the proportions of Gleason patterns (GP) 3-5. While pure GP3 has minimal metastatic potential, it is unclear whether GP3 quantity in the presence of GP4 and GP5 affects oncological outcomes.
objectiveTo assess the predictive value of PCa biopsy GP lengths on long-term metastasis-free survival (MFS).
methodsProstate biopsies of 1,881 men with screen-detected PCa who participated in the Dutch part of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) between 1993 and 2007 were revised for GP 3-5 length. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between GP lengths and MFS truncated at 20 years, adjusting for clinical-tumour stage (cT), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage positive biopsies and the presence of invasive cribriform/intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: On multivariable analysis, ≥cT2, PSA, percentage positive cores and absolute length of GP4 and GP5 were all significantly associated with MFS. The discriminative ability was improved by adding CR/IDC to the model. Total GP3 length was neither associated with MFS in the model with (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.00, P = 0.3) nor without CR/IDC (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, P = 0.2). A limitation is the lack of targeted biopsies. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: GP3 length does not have an impact on the prediction of MFS in biopsies, once GP4/GP5 lengths are known. Although GP3 percentage is essential in Gleason grading, MFS is related to absolute GP4 and GP5 quantity rather than their proportion to GP3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.