ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Quantitative cardiac CT perfusion: physiologically-inspired model and identifying microvascular disease from discordant CTA CAD-RADS.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Use our advanced, physiologically inspired cardiac CT perfusion (CCTP) software to distinguish ischemia due to obstructive disease vs. microvascular disease (MVD). Background: Previously validated advanced CCTP methods were used. We interpreted results to identify flow-limiting stenosis [i.e., obstructive-lesion & low myocardial blood flow (MBF)] vs. microvascular disease (i.e., no-obstructive-lesion & low-MBF). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 104 patients with suspected CAD, including 18 with diabetes, who underwent CCTA + CCTP. Whole heart and territorial MBF was assessed using our automated pipeline for CCTP analysis that included beam hardening correction; temporal scan registration; automated segmentation; fast, accurate, robust MBF estimation; and visualization. Stenosis severity was scored using the CCTA coronary-artery-disease-reporting-and-data-system (CAD-RADS), with obstructive stenosis deemed as CAD-RADS ≥ 3. Results: We established a threshold MBF (MBF = 200-mL/min-100 g) for normal perfusion. In patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 3 (obstructive disease), 28/37(76%) patients showed ischemia in the corresponding territory. On a per-vessel basis ( Conclusion: CCTA in conjunction with a new automated quantitative CCTP approach can determine the distinction of ischemia due to obstructive lesions vs. MVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.