ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Identifying essential medications for critical care: initial findings from US academic intensive care units.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) shoulder a disproportionately high amount of death and disability caused by both communicable and non-communicable diseases. As a result, there is a higher occurrence of serious illness in these countries. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) have emerged in the past twenty years in LMICs. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines lacks many common medicines used in critical care, and the lack of necessary medications to treat critical illnesses has hindered the function of these ICUs. This study aimed to develop a list of commonly used essential medications in the ICU to serve as the foundation for a multi-phase project. Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional survey of all the program directors of all the Critical Care fellowship training programs in the United States of America. The study surveyed a multidisciplinary group of critical care providers to assess the first, second, and third-line preferred medication use in 10 categories of medications: sedatives, vasopressors, inotropes, antiarrhythmics, intravenous antihypertensives, neuromuscular blocking agents, medications for the management of ICU delirium, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and analgesics, to create a list of 26 commonly used critical care medicines. Results: Of the 588 contacted programs, 133 completed the survey questionnaire, representing a 23% response rate with an over-representation from the East Coast and the Midwest. Seven medication categories had a clear first-line preference, while only three had clear second-line preference respondents. Conclusion: This survey successfully identified the 26 most commonly used medications in the ICU grouped into 10 categories. This list will serve as a foundational reference for future phases of the research project, which will include engagement with stakeholders from LMICs to refine and adapt the list to regional realities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.