SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
The potential of acupuncture in treating sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global population is aging at an unprecedented rate, leading to a sharp rise in late-life diseases such as sarcopenia. Despite its increasing prevalence, effective pharmacological treatments, exercise regimens, and dietary recommendations for sarcopenia remain limited. Acupuncture has demonstrated potential in improving quality of life for individuals with sarcopenia. However, whether acupuncture is effective for treating sarcopenia remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of acupuncture in treating sarcopenia. We conducted a comprehensive search across nine major English and Chinese electronic databases, covering all available studies up to May 2024. We compared sarcopenia outcomes between patients who received acupuncture and those who did not. The retrieved literature was systematically organized and categorized using EndNote 21. We performed data analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 18.0. Our comprehensive search identified 1,106 publications, including 384 basic research, 324 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 281 unrelated studies, 109 randomized controlled trials, and 8 case reports. Finally we analyzed 10 RCTs. Compared to conventional treatment, acupuncture significantly improved total treatment efficiency (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.13-1.73), muscle mass (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.19-2.43), grip strength (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.83), and usual gait speed (SMD = 2.53, 95% CI: 0.78-4.28). Additionally, acupuncture reducing C-reactive protein levels (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI: -1.42--0.56). Among the results, acupuncture-based therapies demonstrated therapeutic potential on muscle mass and some physical function in patients with sarcopenia. Moreover, acupuncture constitutes an essential complementary modality for frail older adults unable to tolerate conventional treatments. However, the limited number and quality of RCTs necessitates further research to confirm these findings and fully elucidate acupuncture's potential in sarcopenia management. Further validation through multicenter, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is essential to ensure the robustness and generalizability of these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251040930, Identifier, CRD420251040930.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.