ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma as a secondary cancer following radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a case report and literature review.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) as a secondary malignancy following radiotherapy is extremely rare. We report a case of MPM that developed as a secondary malignancy after initial concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer.Case Presentation.A 52-year-old woman with no history of asbestos exposure underwent definitive CCRT for stage IIB cervical cancer, as classified by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Over 10 years after initial treatment, she developed ascites. Diagnostic laparoscopy led to a pathological diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma. Given the absence of asbestos exposure and her medical history, the tumor was considered a radiation-induced secondary cancer. The patient received two lines of chemotherapy, but her performance status progressively declined, and she was transitioned to best supportive care. She died 1 year and 8 months after the MPM diagnosis. Discussion: This case highlights the importance of long-term surveillance following radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Including this case, only four reports exist of MPM developing as a secondary malignancy following pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer. In all cases, patients presented with abdominal symptoms and ascites. The case findings underscore the need for clinicians to consider secondary malignancies such as MPM when ascites is detected during follow-up and to pursue a thorough diagnostic workup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.