ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Congenital Pouch Colon in Males: Exploring the Risk of Epididymo-orchitis.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) are known to have a higher association with epididymo-orchitis (EO). Congenital pouch colon (CPC), a rare subtype of ARM, presents with several predisposing factors that are presumed to be linked with EO. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of EO in this specific subgroup of ARM patients to enhance the understanding of its etiology. Materials and Methods: An ambispective observational study was conducted by analyzing medical records of male patients with CPC. Out of 28 patients managed primarily at our center, 25 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age at follow-up was 3.36 ± 1.33 years. Type IV CPC was the most common, seen in 12 (45.8%) patients. Hydroureteronephrosis was detected in 13 patients at initial presentation via abdominal ultrasonography, and 7 (28%) patients had a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Cystoscopic evaluation revealed an ascended verumontanum into the bladder neck with the colovesical fistula near the verumontanum in nine patients. Only one patient, who had recurrent UTIs since infancy and voiding difficulties, experienced two episodes of EO. This patient also had multiple associated genitourinary and spinal anomalies. None of the remaining patients developed EO. Conclusion: Despite the anatomical abnormalities associated with CPC, only 1 out of the 25 patients developed EO. Early division of the pouch vesical fistula and minimal dissection around the prostatic urethra may significantly reduce the risk of EO in this population. However, further research involving larger patient cohorts is necessary to better understand the underlying mechanisms and validate these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.