ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Extracting
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate plots distribution mapping of the renowned Chinese medicinal plant, Methods: This study utilized unmanned aerial vehicle RGB images to investigate the high-precision extraction of LC cultivation plots based on feature variable combinations across four representative sites: Site 1 (S1, traditional LC cultivation area in Dujiangyan City), Site 2 (S2, concentrated LC plots in Dujiangyan City), Site 3 (S3, traditional LC cultivation area in Pengzhou City), and Site 4 (S4, newly-developed LC cultivation area in Mianzhu City). Initially, appropriate color indices, texture features, color spaces, and digital elevation models were extracted from RGB images to form feature variable combinations. Subsequently, pixel-based classification and object-oriented classification methods were employed to construct LC cultivation plot extraction models. Results: The results showed that compared with classification results based on RGB images, the object-oriented classification method (k-nearest neighbor, KNN) based on feature variable combinations showed the highest overall classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient. The average Kappa coefficients for the classification of S1, S2, S3, and S4 were 0.86, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.90, respectively, while the overall accuracy rates were 89.16%, 95.72%, 94.55%, and 92.25%, respectively. The F1 scores averaged 99.62%, 98.11%, 96.11%, and 97.75%, respectively. Across all four sites, the mean Kappa coefficient, overall accuracy, and F1 score were 0.92, 92.92%, and 97.90%, respectively, showing an increase of 0.14, 14.17%, and 4.9% compared to the RGB images. Conclusions: The results indicate that the feature variable combination constructed based on UAV-based RGB remote sensing images can enhance the extraction accuracy of LC's cultivation plots without incurring additional data acquisition costs. The research findings can provide theoretical and technical references for remote sensing measurement of similar medicinal plant cultivation varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.