ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Hope for 17 patients with chronic cluster headache: efficacy evaluation of upper cervical spinal nerve root release surgery (2020-2023).
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upper cervical spinal nerve root release surgery in the treatment of chronic cluster headache. Method: This retrospective study reviewed 17 patients diagnosed with chronic cluster headache who underwent upper cervical spinal nerve root release surgery between August 2020 and March 2023. Data collected included demographic information, headache characteristics (frequency, duration, and intensity), preoperative treatment regimens, and postoperative outcomes. The surgical procedure aimed to alleviate nerve compression in the upper cervical region to improve neurological function. Patients were routinely followed postoperatively to assess the therapeutic impact through headache symptom relief assessments, including headache impact tests, pain scores, and quality of life evaluations. Result: All 17 patients completed the surgery without severe complications. Our 6-month follow-up data demonstrated notable improvements in headache symptoms, with a significant reduction in the frequency and duration of headache episodes and alleviation of pain intensity. Specifically, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery were (2.76 ± 1.16), (2.25 ± 0.45), (1.95 ± 0.47), and (1.75 ± 0.48), respectively. The frequency of headache episodes decreased to (1.96 ± 0.42), (1.45 ± 0.36), (0.95 ± 0.32), and (0.76 ± 0.28) times per month, respectively. The duration of each episode was reduced to (14.68 ± 4.75), (9.44 ± 3.28), (6.65 ± 2.52), and (4.55 ± 1.34) minutes, respectively. Moreover, patients reported significant enhancements in quality of life and resumed normal work and social activities. Conclusion: The findings from this case series suggest that upper cervical spinal nerve root release surgery is a safe and effective treatment for chronic cluster headache, offering substantial clinical improvements. However, due to the small sample size, further large-scale, placebo-controlled studies are essential to corroborate these results, validate the long-term efficacy and safety of the procedure, and accurately determine the contribution of the surgical intervention beyond the placebo effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.