ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Comparison of Online-to-Offline Teaching Rounds and Bedside Teaching Rounds in Nephrology Residency Training.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most surveys today show a marked decline in traditional beside teaching rounds (BTR) in medical education. The online-to-offline (O2O) teaching mode has been associated with improvement of academic performance of learners. This study aimed to compare the O2O teaching rounds (O2OTR) with BTR on a nephrology inpatient service and assess efficiency and satisfaction among residents. Methods: A total of 79 trainees who participated in the nephrology residency training, were randomized either to the O2OTR group or the BTR group (control). Theoretical knowledge tests, clinical case scenarios, and questionnaires were integrated to systematically assess the teaching efficacy. Results: Thirty-eight residents were assigned to the O2OTR group, while the other 41 were assigned to the BTR group. Baseline demographics and performance were comparable between groups. Residents in the O2OTR group demonstrated superior performance in clinical case scenarios compared to those in the BTR group ( Conclusion: This study suggests that the O2OTR mode serves as an effective and alternative approach in the nephrology residency training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.