Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293395›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Extended Reconstruction of the Right Forearm as Treatment for a Giant Cell Tumor With the Combined Use of a Free Fibular Flap and a Pedicled Inguinal Flap.

Guillermo Sergio Dorantes-Millan, Rodrigo Banegas Ruiz, Ana Claudia López Contreras, Jesús Rigoberto Covarrubias Rodríguez, Alejandro Elnecave Olaiz, Francisco Emilio Ferreira Aparicio, Gerardo Rafael Gutiérrez Sevilla

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillermo Sergio Dorantes-MillanPlastic Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Fernando Quiroz Gutierrez, Mexico City, MEX.
Rodrigo Banegas RuizPlastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.
Ana Claudia López ContrerasPlastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.
Jesús Rigoberto Covarrubias RodríguezPlastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.
Alejandro Elnecave OlaizPlastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.
Francisco Emilio Ferreira AparicioPlastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.
Gerardo Rafael Gutiérrez SevillaMedical Education and Orthopedic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign neoplasm with aggressive behavior, predominantly affecting young adults. In the majority of these lesions, curettage is the treatment of choice; however, those classified as Campanacci grade III typically require extensive surgical resection, resulting in significant bone and soft tissue defects. This represents a significant reconstructive challenge but offers the opportunity for limb preservation and functional maintenance instead of amputation. We present a 39-year-old male with a grade III GCTB of the distal radius, who had extensive tumor resection followed by a staged reconstructive approach in four distinct surgical phases. These involved excision of the lesion, reconstruction with a free fibular flap, and skin coverage using a pedicled inguinal flap. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no evidence of recurrence at three months. Functional recovery was favorable, with a wrist range of motion of 40° flexion and 30° extension. No postoperative complications were observed. The combined use of a free fibular flap and a pedicled inguinal flap proved to be an effective reconstructive strategy for managing complex upper extremity circumferential defects.

Indexed as

bone and soft tissue reconstructionflapfree fibular flapmicrosurgical reconstructionreconstructive surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID41293395
PMCPMC12643055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.