ArticleCureus2025
Umbilicus Porocarcinoma: An Uncommon Neoplasm at a Unique Site.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eccrine porocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neoplasm that mainly affects the elderly patients. It occurs more often in the head and neck, followed by lower limbs. The abdomen, especially the umbilicus, is a very rare presenting location. Diagnosis can be challenging and is usually made based on a combination of clinical, dermoscopical and histopathological findings. The main treatment approach is wide surgical resection, with negative margins. Despite resection, development of nodal or distant metastasis occurs in a few cases. Adjuvant treatment modalities consist of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but the results are inconsistent. Immunotherapy is a novel option to treat these cases, but more studies are needed. Here we present the case of a 73-year-old woman who presented with an enlarging umbilical mass, initially thought to be a metastatic lesion, but the imaging and endoscopic exams showed no other primary tumor. So a biopsy was performed, which revealed a localized eccrine porocarcinoma. After a multidisciplinary decision, the tumor was resected with free margins and no additional treatment was needed. The patient remains in follow-up, with no signs of local recurrence nor nodal or distant metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.