ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Masticatory and Swallowing Functions Using Videoendoscopy and Observation of Facial and Mandibular Movements.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background It is important to observe masticatory and swallowing movements to improve the eating habits of older adults with dysphagia. Observing facial and mandibular movements can be useful for such evaluations. However, the process models that occur while eating solid foods have not been adequately considered. Objective This study aimed to clarify the differences in facial and mandibular movements before and after bolus transport to the pharynx (stage II transport; STII) during the consumption of solid food. Methods As this was conducted as a pilot study, the participants included 20 healthy young adults with normal dentition who freely ate rice crackers while their facial and mandibular movements were recorded using a small mobile device. A video endoscope was inserted nasally to observe STII, and facial and mandibular movements were analyzed before (phase 1) and after (phase 2) STII. The maximum horizontal and vertical distances from the origin, velocity, total distance of movement, and the number, duration, and frequency of mastication cycles were calculated. These variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Results The maximum horizontal distances, maximum vertical distances, velocity, and total distances of both oral commissures and the mandible were significantly decreased in phase 2 compared with phase 1. The number, duration, and frequency of mastication also significantly decreased in phase 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion Facial and mandibular movements differed between phases 1 and 2 during the consumption of solid foods. Despite the limitation that the research participants were young adults, it is important to focus on the lateral and downward movements of both oral commissures and the mandible, as well as the chewing frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.