ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and survival prognosis analysis of surgical resection combined with targeted therapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microenvironment-Driven Reprogramming in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Metabolic, Phenotypic, and Immune Adaptation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a leading cause of death in colorectal cancer patients. Simple surgical resection has a high recurrence rate, and combining targeted therapy offers a new way to improve prognosis. Currently, the efficacy of surgery combined with targeted therapy and the influencing factors of prognosis still require in-depth exploration. Methods: From January 2019 to February 2022, 76 CRLM patients were randomly split into an observation group (n=38, surgery + chemotherapy + bevacizumab-based targeted therapy) and a control group (n=38, surgery + conventional chemotherapy). Key indicators were compared, and Cox regression analyzed prognosis factors. Results: There were no significant differences in operation time (185.6±32.4 min vs. 178.9±29.5 min) or intraoperative blood loss (210.3±56.7 ml vs. 205.8±51.2 ml) between groups (P>0.05). However, the observation group had a shorter hospital stay (10.2±2.1 days vs. 12.5±2.6 days, P<0.05), higher ORR (68.9% vs. 46.7%) and DCR (91.1% vs. 75.6%, both P<0.05), and better 1-, 2-, 3-year PFS (72.2%/45.6%/31.1% vs. 51.1%/26.7%/15.6%) and OS (86.7%/64.4%/48.9% vs. 71.1%/42.2%/27.8%, all P<0.05). The observation group also had a higher hypertension rate (23.3% vs. 6.7%, P<0.05), with no other significant adverse reaction differences (P>0.05). Cox regression showed targeted therapy and ≤3 liver metastases were independent factors for favorable prognosis (P<0.05). Discussion: Surgical resection combined with targeted therapy can effectively improve tumor control efficacy and long-term survival outcomes of CRLM patients, and shorten the hospital stay. Although this combined regimen increases the risk of hypertension, its overall safety is controllable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.