ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Developing a training program of knowledge and skills in the context of administrative involuntary hospitalization: a pilot trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To deal with offenders with mental disorder, the administrative involuntary hospitalization (AIH) scheme was adopted in Japan in 1950. However, its outcomes as well as standard of AIH adaptation remain obscure. Recently we developed a training program for improving the skills for AIH decision-making for early-career psychiatrists. The aim of this pilot study is to implement and investigate the effectiveness of this program. Methods: Through snowball sampling, this open interventional exploratory pilot study recruited licensed physicians who possessed or intended to acquire a designated psychiatrist license. Eighteen physicians were enrolled and attended a 4 h seminar including group discussion following a self-learning video session. Subsequently, they completed the Mental Health and Welfare Act Administrative Involuntary Hospitalization Test (AIH Test). An unpaired t-test was used for analysis of the AIH Test scores. Results: In total, 17 participants (mean age, 35.6 ± 5.5 years) completed the post-seminar questionnaire on the effectiveness of the seminar. The mean ± standard deviation AIH Test score improved from 12.1 ± 2.1 before the seminar to 14.7 ± 3.9 after the seminar (degrees of freedom = 34, t = -2.45, P = 0.019 [two-tailed]), indicating a significant improvement in knowledge of AIH. As a secondary outcome, scores on the Academic Motivation Scale, reflecting the motivation to study forensic psychiatry, did not change significantly before and after the seminar. Discussion: Our AIH skills training program improves knowledge of AIH, without affecting the motivation to study forensic psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.