Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Estimation of habitual intake of infrequently consumed nutrients using the mixture distribution method.

Smitha Joseph, Santu Ghosh, Sumathi Swaminathan, Tinku Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Smitha JosephResearch Scholar, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.
Santu GhoshDepartment of Biostatistics, St. John's Medical College, and Hospital, SJNAHS, Bangalore, India.
Sumathi SwaminathanDivision of Nutrition, St. John's Research Institute, SJNAHS, Bangalore, India.
Tinku ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, St. John's Medical College, and Hospital, SJNAHS, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The habitual intake of infrequently consumed nutrients typically exhibits a highly skewed distribution, primarily driven by the reported consumption and non-consumption of nutrients in repeated 24-h dietary recalls. The current methods for estimating this distribution are often computationally intense. Methods: A mixture distribution method (MDM) was proposed to estimate habitual intake distribution of infrequently consumed nutrients, in which the frequency of consumption of a nutrient was modeled using a beta-binomial distribution and the amount consumed using a gamma distribution. The habitual intake using this method was compared to the Iowa State University Foods (ISUF) method using sample data consisting of four non-consecutive 24-h diet recalls collected from 120 children aged 6-59 months in Bihar, India. To assess the impact of zero inflation on the estimation of habitual intake, nutrient intakes were simulated with varying percentages of positive intakes, and habitual intakes were calculated using both methods. Results: The median (IQR) habitual intakes estimated from the MDM and ISUF methods were 0.47 mg (0.29, 0.65) and 0.46 mg (0.29, 0.62) for vitamin B Discussion: The proposed MDM offers a computationally simpler approach to estimate habitual intake distribution by modeling the probability distribution of non-consumption and the distribution of positive intakes. The procedure can be easily implemented using standard statistical software and estimates habitual intake for infrequently consumed nutrients from multiple 24-h dietary recalls.

Indexed as

24-h recallbeta-binomial distributiongamma regressionhabitual intakemeasurement error

Identifiers

PMID41293185
PMCPMC12641393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.