Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293110›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Factors influencing caster board skill acquisition.

Hiroo Suzuki, Takehito Hirakawa, Yuji Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroo SuzukiFaculty of Economics, Ryukoku University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takehito HirakawaSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Yuji YamamotoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In motor learning research, various whole-body movement tasks have been examined using a dynamical systems approach. Prior studies have highlighted that differences in learning strategies and variability in movement contribute to individual differences in motor learning. Building on these findings, this study investigated the learning process of seven beginners as they attempted to ride a caster board for the first time and progressed until they were able to stand and ride it. Specifically, we aimed to compare and contrast commonalities and differences in the learning process to identify the factors contributing to individual differences and to clarify the motor skills crucial for mastering the caster board. To quantify movement changes associated with learning, we analyzed the initial velocity of the board and the amplitude of trunk rotational movement. Trial-by-trial changes were calculated to determine which variable exhibited greater change for each participant. Across all the participants, both initial velocity and trunk rotational movement increased with practice. These findings suggest that accelerating the board's initial velocity, which enhances stability, and increasing the amplitude of trunk rotational movement, which generates propulsive force, are both critical for mastering the caster board riding. However, the number of trials required to achieve the learning task varied by more than 100 trials across participants, and individual differences were also evident in the movement patterns at task completion. Case-based analyses revealed that these differences were influenced by the movement patterns performed in the early trials and by the variability in movement patterns executed across trials.

Indexed as

dynamical systems theoryindividual differenceslongitudinal observationmotor learningvariability of movement

Identifiers

PMID41293110
PMCPMC12642812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.