Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293102›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Innovations in dementia screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of virtual reality assessments.

Åsmund Gausemel, Petra Filkuková

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Åsmund GausemelDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Petra FilkukováDepartment of Psychology, University of Inland Norway, Lillehammer, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rising prevalence of dementia, driven by aging populations, presents a global public health challenge. Pharmacological treatments offer limited benefits unless initiated during pre-symptomatic stages, emphasizing the need for early, accurate, and cost-effective screening methods. This review investigates the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of virtual reality-based assessments for identifying mild cognitive impairment, a prodromal stage of dementia. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and IEEE Xplore was conducted to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of virtual reality tools for mild cognitive impairment detection. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated through meta-analysis, and methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Virtual reality-based assessments demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.883 and 0.887, respectively. Among 13 studies using machine learning, pooled sensitivity was 0.888 and specificity 0.885. Further sub-group analysis was done according to immersion degree, MCI-subtype and reference standard. Tools integrating machine learning with EEG or movement data showed particular promise. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that virtual reality (VR) assessments have a promising level of accuracy for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Nevertheless, the results are preliminary, and their interpretation warrants caution due to the substantial methodological heterogeneity observed among the included studies. Despite the potential of VR as a cost-effective solution for dementia screening, its implementation faces notable barriers, including the requirement for specialized personnel and the absence of clear data regarding software and support costs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)dementiamachine learningmild cognitive impairmentscreeningvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41293102
PMCPMC12640857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.