ArticleWearable technologies2025
Assessing real-world movements using consumer-grade wearable devices: Measuring segment orientations and movement quality.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been growing interest regarding the impact of human movement quality on health. However, assessing movement quality outside of laboratories or clinics remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the capabilities of consumer-grade wearables to assess movement quality and to consider optimal sensor locations. Twenty-two participants wore Polar Verity Sense magnetic, angular rate, and gravity (MARG) sensors on their chest and both wrists, thighs, and ankles, while performing repeated bodyweight movements. The Madgwick sensor-fusion algorithm was utilized to obtain three-dimensional orientations. Concurrent validity, quantified using the root-mean-square-error (RMSE), was established against a Vicon optical motion capture system following time-synchronization and coordinate-system alignment. The chest sensors demonstrated the highest accuracies overall, with mean RMSE () less than 9.0° across all movements. In contrast, the wrist sensors varied considerably (). Ankle and thigh sensors yielded mixed results, with the ranging from 2.0° to 40.0°. Notably, yaw angles consistently demonstrated higher discrepancies overall, while pitch and roll were relatively more stable. This study highlights the potential of consumer-grade MARG sensors to increase the real-world applicability and accessibility of complex biomechanical models. It also accentuates the requirement for strategic sensor placement and refined calibration and postprocessing methods to ensure accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.