ReviewJournal of pain research2025
Chronic Post-Surgical Pain After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Update on Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Interventional Treatment Modalities.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, hip and knee arthroplasties are amongst the most frequently performed elective surgeries. While generally effective, a subset of patients develop chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) in the affected joint. The management of CPSP is an incredibly important area of ongoing research, as the prevalence of individuals with arthroplasties continues to climb. Currently, there is a lack of best practice guidelines dedicated to CPSP of the hip and knee following arthroplasty. While conservative modalities including physical rehabilitation, pharmacologics, and psychological interventions remain the cornerstone of management of CPSP, this review aims to fill an important knowledge gap by providing an overview of the existing interventional treatment modalities. Procedures discussed include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, and intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS). Moreover, it explores other emerging therapies. To date, RFA for CPSP has the most supporting evidence, with strong support for cooled RFA. However, neuromodulation techniques including PRF, PNS, SCS and DRG stimulation each may offer promising results in treating CPSP of the hip and knee. Ultimately, without comparative analyses, the decision regarding which to pursue relies upon shared decision-making with the patient focused on tailoring treatments to the presumed underlying mechanism in line with resource availability and associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.