ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Impact of image preprocessing on dermatological OCTA vessel segmentation: a DERMA-OCTA study.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) offers dye-free, three-dimensional views of skin microvasculature, yet progress in developing reliable and quantitative solutions for vessel architecture analysis is slowed by heterogeneous preprocessing practices, scarce annotated data, and limited evaluation metrics. Aim: We assess how typical OCTA preprocessing steps influence the accuracy of deep learning vessel segmentation, and we identify network designs and metrics best suited to OCTA dermatological data. Approach: Experiments use the open DERMA-OCTA dataset containing 330 volumes from different skin conditions; each volume is additionally provided in five progressively pre-processed versions: original, Bscan normalization, projection artifact attenuation, contrast enhancement, and vesselness filtering. Segmentation is performed with representative 2D and 3D deep learning approaches. Besides standard segmentation metrics, evaluation includes the connectivity-area-length index, which proved particularly effective for assessing dermatological vessel segmentation. Results: The analysis shows that Bscan normalization, projection artifact attenuation, and contrast enhancement incrementally improve segmentation accuracy, whereas vesselness enhancement can impair segmentation performance. Among the tested architectures, 2D models achieved the highest segmentation performance, although 3D approaches proved more effective for deeper tissue layers. Testing across different pathologies revealed challenges in model generalization to varied vascular patterns. Conclusions: Combining 2D and 3D models and using topology-aware indices provide a full, clinically relevant evaluation of algorithm performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.