Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293042›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Incorporating active commuting into daily life: a narrative review of e-bikes' impact on health and urban air quality.

Alessandro Sampieri, Antonio Paoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro SampieriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Antonio PaoliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of rising physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyles, and worsening air quality, innovative solutions that promote individual well-being, public health, and urban sustainability are urgently needed. Active commuting (AC) and particularly e-bikes offer a promising and scalable intervention, particularly in Europe, where millions of workers commute daily, and the transport sector remains a leading source of pollution. This narrative review was conducted by searching peer-reviewed articles and institutional reports on scientific databases until December 2024, focusing primarily on European studies. This review examined the impact of AC and e-bikes on physical activity, health, air quality, urban mobility, and technological innovations. Findings reveal that AC and e-bikes represent a viable alternative to integrate low- to moderate-intensity physical activity into daily routines, while mitigating the health risks associated with prolonged sitting. Evidence also showed that e-bikes contribute to reduced CO₂ emissions and improved urban mobility. However, adoption rates across Europe remain relatively low and heterogeneous, making it crucial to understand the individual, and social factors influencing their use. Beyond their physical and environmental benefits, e-bikes are increasingly embedded within intelligent transport systems, featuring IoT connectivity, real-time monitoring, and user-centered design that enhance safety, and user engagement. This review highlights the role of e-bikes as a bridge between public health, urban planning, and digital innovation, providing actionable insights for policymakers committed to promoting active lifestyles and building more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities.

Indexed as

active commutingair pollutione-bikephysical activitysedentary behaviorurban mobility

Identifiers

PMID41293042
PMCPMC12641026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.