Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41293022›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

The cerebellar components of the human language network.

Colton Casto, Moshe Poliak, Greta Tuckute, Hannah Small, Patrick Sherlock, Agata Wolna, Benjamin Lipkin, Anila M D'Mello, Evelina Fedorenko

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Colton CastoKempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-1470
Moshe PoliakBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5000-6668
Greta TuckuteBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5572-5469
Hannah SmallCognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-468X
Patrick SherlockBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0009-0006-6571-0136
Agata WolnaBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-104X
Benjamin LipkinBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-5315
Anila M D'MelloPsychiatry Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-6653-7802
Evelina FedorenkoProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology (SHBT), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-3823-514X

Funding

Computational Neuroscience of Language Processing in the Human BrainU01NS121471 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
The neural architecture of pragmatic processingR01DC016607 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016607NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS121471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum's capacity for neural computation is arguably unmatched. Yet despite now ample evidence of cerebellar contributions to cognition, including language, its precise role in language processing remains debated. Here, we systematically characterize cerebellar language-responsive regions using precision fMRI. We identify four cerebellar regions that respond to language across modalities (Experiments 1a-b, n=754). One region-spanning Crus I/II/lobule VIIb-is selective for language relative to diverse non-linguistic perceptual, cognitive, and motor tasks (Experiments 2a-f, n=732), and the rest exhibit mixed-selective profiles, responding strongly to language but also to one or more of the non-linguistic conditions. Similar to the neocortical language system, the language-selective region is engaged by sentence-level meanings during comprehension and production (Experiments 3a-b, n=100) and shows fine-grained sensitivity to linguistic processing difficulty (Experiment 3c, n=5). Further, this region's response to language is not due to the frequent presence of social content in language, as it is strongly engaged by both social and nonsocial sentences (Experiment 3d, n=10). Finally, all four regions, but especially Crus I/II/VIIb, are functionally connected to the neocortical language system (Experiment 4, n=85). We propose that these cerebellar regions constitute components of the extended language network, with one region supporting linguistic semantic processing and closely mirroring the selectivity of the neocortical language network, and the other three plausibly integrating information from diverse neocortical regions.

Identifiers

PMID41293022
PMCPMC12642429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.