ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Mechanistic Understanding of Protein-MOF Integration through Surfactant-Driven Interfacial Design.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integration of proteins into metal-organic frameworks (Protein@MOF) represents an effective method for protein stabilization, with rising demand across material and biomedical sciences. However, the molecular mechanism of protein-MOF interactions remains unsettled due to challenges in developing a general platform to systematically investigate such interactions, hindering improvements in their chemical and physical properties. Here, we develop a surfactant-guided strategy to modulate the assembly of protein@MOF through interfacial design. We discovered that the interfacial environment between proteins and MOFs is the primary factor determining encapsulation efficiency, structural retention, and functional performance. Lipid-based non-ionic surfactants such as glycerol monooleate (GMO) increase the protein's solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), suggesting partial remodeling of the protein surface and hydration shell. GMO at the interface of protein@MOF results in a 20% improvement in protein encapsulation and a 30% increase in MOF growth rate. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations reveal domain-specific interactions between GMO and flexible surface residues on protein in a concentration-dependent manner, involving both electrostatic and hydrophobic contacts. This work offers new molecular insights into how surfactant-driven interfacial design fine-tunes the stability of protein@MOF, laying the foundation for robust alternatives to lipid nanodiscs for membrane protein stabilization, and protein-based platforms for drug-delivery, biocatalysis, and biosensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.