Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292905›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Challenges in Predicting Chromatin Accessibility Differences between Species.

Amy Stephen, Arian Raje, Heather H Sestili, Morgan E Wirthlin, Alyssa J Lawler, Ashley R Brown, William R Stauffer, Andreas R Pfenning, Irene M Kaplow

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy StephenMathematical Sciences Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8872-8972
Arian RajeRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Heather H SestiliRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-3429
Morgan E WirthlinRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-7070
Alyssa J LawlerRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-5164
Ashley R BrownRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3091-3930
William R StaufferDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1031-8824
Andreas R PfenningRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-9801
Irene M KaplowRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8924-8269

Funding

Interpreting the regulatory mechanisms underlying the predisposition to substance use disordersDP1DA046585 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI PFENNING, ANDREAS ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA046585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancers are transcriptional regulatory elements that help drive phenotypic diversity, yet they often undergo rapid sequence evolution despite functional conservation, posing a challenge for predicting their function across species. Machine learning models that predict quantitative enhancer activity using DNA sequence have not previously been evaluated for their ability to predict quantitative differences across orthologous regions. Here, we trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on a regression task to predict chromatin accessibility, which is a proxy for enhancer activity, in the liver across five mammals, and we developed a novel framework to evaluate cross-species performance. We demonstrated that training on multiple species improves model generalization to both species used in training and held-out species. However, the models consistently achieved poor performance in predicting quantitative differences in accessibility between species at orthologous regions. Our study highlights the challenges in using regression models to predict chromatin accessibility changes between species.

Identifiers

PMID41292905
PMCPMC12642317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.